Casey Newton called it:

A judge rules that Google must spin out its ad exchange

We find out by Dec 31, 2026. 126 days to go

Open

Casey Newton: “A judge rules that Google must spin out its ad exchange

🔒 The test · locked Aug 28, 2026

MET if A US federal court issues a remedies decision in the government's advertising-technology antitrust case against Google requiring Google to divest or spin out its ad exchange (AdX). Behavioral remedies, voluntary commitments, appeals-stage rulings that do not order divestiture, and settlements without divestiture do not count at any point, before 2026-12-31 23:59 (UTC).

Settles by documented review of public evidence against these locked criteria; the reviewer is named and the reasoning published.

Test details
Settled byevidence
Window2025-12-18 2026-12-31
TimezoneUTC
Data vintagelatest_revision
Min source tier1
Contract hash0xac1334ce…8fce63
Full resolution criteria

True if, during 2026, a US court issues a remedies ruling in the government's ad tech antitrust case against Google that orders Google to divest its ad exchange (AdX). A behavioral-only remedy, a settlement without divestiture, or no remedies ruling in 2026 makes it false.

Quote verified against the source

Casey NewtonPlatformerSaid Dec 18, 2025Added to Thonest Aug 28, 2026Anchored Aug 28, 2026

Added by Thonest from a public source. The person quoted did not submit, approve, or endorse this record; the wording is verified against the source itself.

Read the original on platformer.news

Reactions are about the record being worth keeping — never about whether the person was right. They are never counted for or against anyone, and never used to rank anything.

Discussion

Loading…

Prediction headline in Platformer's '11 predictions for 2026', following the government's win in the Google ad tech antitrust case.

History — append-only

2026-08-28
Recorded · Recorded and locked from the original source

Proof

Evidence hash0xe3a5e6f3…f985c2
Source snapshot
Record fingerprint0xe3a5e6f3cbde8b797421edda1cc3ba6c7a778d8aae5df53a22b7bfbff7f985c2
Proof path
3 hashes from this record to the anchored root
  1. 0xd38243b2ea52dc3418a58431f2661587019a4c8b8705c007cd3f5d620ae61678
  2. 0x43faa494bae36556db644312732f121764d36ce6121f483498a731660430c2ec
  3. 0xa92085b9344de8b99c60109d0beec3e4b2b710a7d71f0b8471c026916bc92a03
Merkle root0x26bb2b2b4c480736e0b0418e3f417607f5763c4365ac5031fa7a83fcaf88a4ec
batch #105 manifest · 8 entries
Registry0x3d74d9e2f0f4c741fc49b34cc119b6db0cef47c0 · entry #114
the contract refuses any batch that doesn’t follow the previous one, and has no function to edit or delete one — including for us
Anchored onchainbase-mainnet · Aug 28, 2026
0x371b7ab1…36e894 on block explorer
Third-party archiveNone
No independent copy could be captured for this source.
Quote checkThe quote appears verbatim in the response the platform returned.
Platform capture0xab2531789644cd64f175b9ef76dfb249938463a55663f5e0360220cbbbcd0173
view the canonical capture · the page as served to us, kept verbatim and covered by the evidence hash

✓ The anchored proof cannot be rewritten, and the published record is append-only by default. Everything that happened afterward is in the history above — corrections are appended, never silently edited in.

Verify this record yourself

The check runs in your browser and reads the anchored root straight from a public Base node — not from Thonest. How this works.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed. If something here is wrong — a misquote, a wrong date, a misattributed source — say so and it gets answered on the record. How disputes work.

Related

GoogleUS Department of Justicead tech antitrust remedies