Bryan Caplan said it:

I’ve paid him $250, and if the world doesn’t end by January 1, 2030, Colburn will repay me $500 inflation-adjusted.

We find out by Jan 1, 2030. 1,228 days to go

OpenCommitment

Bryan Caplan: “I’ve paid him $250, and if the world doesn’t end by January 1, 2030, Colburn will repay me $500 inflation-adjusted.

🔒 The test · locked Aug 22, 2026

MET if On January 1, 2030, there are still biological humans running around on the surface of the Earth (the explicit definition of the world not having ended used in the Caplan-Yudkowsky bet terms Colburn accepted). Partial catastrophes, mass casualties, or civilizational collapse do NOT count as the world ending so long as biological humans remain alive on the Earth's surface on the deadline date, before 2030-01-01 00:00 (UTC).

Settles by documented review of public evidence against these locked criteria; the reviewer is named and the reasoning published.

Test details
Settled byevidence
Window2026-04-21 2030-01-01
TimezoneUTC
Data vintagelatest_revision
Min source tier3
Contract hash0x5db40ac8…b23634
Full resolution criteria

Settled on January 1, 2030: if biological humans are still alive and present on the surface of the Earth on that date (i.e. the world has not ended by the bet's own definition), the condition holds and Colburn owes Caplan $500 inflation-adjusted against the $250 Caplan prepaid.

Quote verified against the source

Bryan CaplanBet On It (Substack)Said Apr 21, 2026Added to Thonest Aug 22, 2026Anchored Aug 22, 2026

Added by Thonest from a public source. The person quoted did not submit, approve, or endorse this record; the wording is verified against the source itself.

Read the original on betonit.ai

Caplan announces a new end-of-the-world bet with Greg Colburn (Colbourn) on his Substack blog, April 21, 2026.

History — append-only

2026-08-22
Recorded · Recorded and locked from the original source

Proof

Evidence hash0x7e5a4ce7…f3b72d
Source snapshot
Record fingerprint0x7e5a4ce71bc8905e15245c2b1a497e34b1f94dcf4f4426093d58444a4ef3b72d
Proof path
2 hashes from this record to the anchored root
  1. 0x7ed1ac71cce9ac16ea7130c789c15d741c30675b5edbf4eeae9add4b552d910e
  2. 0x540041d80c1d3bccf16b21eb1ce6bcebcc9a5bf3b7cb4a7fb9bff286a6bca8aa
Merkle root0xcdf462c43fbba1dc76a970be6711a8756d0fe0aaa36b1a381ab5c6fb6649e6e5
batch #68 manifest · 4 entries
Registry0x3d74d9e2f0f4c741fc49b34cc119b6db0cef47c0 · entry #67
the contract refuses any batch that doesn’t follow the previous one, and has no function to edit or delete one — including for us
Anchored onchainbase-mainnet · Aug 22, 2026
0xc805ae28…440fbe on block explorer
Quote checkThe quote appears verbatim in the response the platform returned.
Platform capture0x179bb88cbd9c38919fc0920645046e74d8f7e347f08e71e958595a120a9dfeca
view the canonical capture · the page as served to us, kept verbatim and covered by the evidence hash

✓ The anchored proof cannot be rewritten, and the published record is append-only by default. Everything that happened afterward is in the history above — corrections are appended, never silently edited in.

Verify this record yourself

The check runs in your browser and reads the anchored root straight from a public Base node — not from Thonest. How this works.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed. If something here is wrong — a misquote, a wrong date, a misattributed source — say so and it gets answered on the record. How disputes work.

Related

Greg ColbournAI existential riskCaplan-Colburn end-of-the-world bet