Elon Musk called it:
“Unless we have some very major setbacks, SpaceX will demonstrate full reusability next year, catching both the booster and the ship and delivering over a hundred tons to a useful orbit.”
We find out by Dec 31, 2026. 126 days to go
Elon Musk: “Unless we have some very major setbacks, SpaceX will demonstrate full reusability next year, catching both the booster and the ship and delivering over a hundred tons to a useful orbit.”
MET if (SpaceX conducts a Starship launch in which BOTH the Super Heavy booster and the Starship upper stage are caught on return (tower/catch-arm capture or equivalent recovery-by-catch). Ocean splashdowns, expendable stages, or landings on legs do not count as a catch and A SpaceX Starship flight delivers more than 100 metric tons of payload mass (including mass simulators, per SpaceX-stated or FAA/regulatory-documented figures) to a stable orbit. Suborbital or transatmospheric trajectories do not count) at any point, before 2026-12-31 23:59 (UTC).
Settles by documented review of public evidence against these locked criteria; the reviewer is named and the reasoning published.
The original wording did not settle the timing on its own. The reading above was chosen at registration and locked with the claim — it was not decided after the fact.
Test details
Resolves true if, on or before 2026-12-31, SpaceX conducts a Starship flight (or flights) in which the Super Heavy booster is caught by the launch tower/catch arms and the Starship upper stage is also caught on return, and in which Starship delivers a payload of more than 100 metric tons to orbit. Splashdown or landing on legs does not count as a catch; mass simulators/payload demonstrators do count as payload if SpaceX or regulatory filings state the delivered mass exceeded 100 metric tons; suborbital trajectories do not count as 'a useful orbit'.
Submitter-attested — no machine-readable source
Added by Thonest from a public source. The person quoted did not submit, approve, or endorse this record; the wording is verified against the source itself.
Watch what they said — from 35:06 ↗
Reactions are about the record being worth keeping — never about whether the person was right. They are never counted for or against anyone, and never used to rank anything.
Discussion
Loading…
- ✓ Video and channel verified by YouTube
- ✓ Statement located at 35:16
- — Transcribed and timestamped by the submitter, who confirms they listened to the passage
Transcribed from the audio and confirmed by the submitter, who listened to this passage. YouTube confirms the video and the channel, not the words — those are checkable in one click by anyone. Watch the full moment →
From "Elon Musk on DOGE, Optimus, Starlink Smartphones, Evolving with AI, Why the West is Imploding" (All-In Podcast).
History — append-only
Proof
2 hashes from this record to the anchored root
- 0x8761c99c42dacccaa139b9734501a5bb786c577fa78ad59e267fcf89afb683ed
- 0x9010029490d06e8d772ae6deb92ec067420afbb7273464e22039a92bc9ba8c4a
batch #89 manifest · 4 entries
the contract refuses any batch that doesn’t follow the previous one, and has no function to edit or delete one — including for us
0x003a6b19…3b556e on block explorer
view the canonical capture · the platform's own API response, kept verbatim and covered by the evidence hash
✓ The anchored proof cannot be rewritten, and the published record is append-only by default. Everything that happened afterward is in the history above — corrections are appended, never silently edited in.
The check runs in your browser and reads the anchored root straight from a public Base node — not from Thonest. How this works.
Disputes
No disputes have been filed. If something here is wrong — a misquote, a wrong date, a misattributed source — say so and it gets answered on the record. How disputes work.