Brian Armstrong called it:
“by 2030 I think it's very likely we'll see a 300,000 and 400,000 dollar Bitcoin”
On the record 0 days and counting. Nobody can edit it, including Brian.
This will never resolve. No objective test could be drawn from these words without inventing criteria the speaker never set, so it is preserved rather than scored. It stays on the record as something said on a date, and is never counted for or against anyone.
Brian Armstrong: “by 2030 I think it's very likely we'll see a 300,000 and 400,000 dollar Bitcoin”
No objective test could be drawn from these words without inventing criteria the speaker never set, so it is preserved rather than scored.
No objective test could be drawn from these words, so nothing can settle it. The statement is preserved and dated, and never counted for or against anyone. Thonest will not invent a threshold or a date that was never said — a claim scored against criteria written afterwards would prove nothing.
Submitter-attested — no machine-readable source
Watch what they said — from 8:58 ↗
- ✓ Video and channel verified by YouTube
- ✓ Statement located at 9:08
- ✓ Transcribed and timestamped by the submitter, who confirms they listened to the passage
I think over the next couple years, by let's say 2030 I think it's very likely we'll see a 300,000 and 400,000 dollar Bitcoin by 2030 I think it's very likely we'll see a 300,000 and 400,000 dollar Bitcoin
Transcribed from the audio and confirmed by the submitter, who listened to this passage. YouTube confirms the video and the channel, not the words — those are checkable in one click by anyone. Watch the full moment →
From the video "The New Bitcoin Bull Run Is Just Beginning (Explained in 10 minutes)".
History — append-only
Proof
2 hashes from this record to the anchored root
- 0xae4b34c4e39b9ef7e24ee47b8aa4d43a3da9e231783b682103a0a0d43a67137f
- 0xefb4c8ae2d1e6aa2953d2a1793547fb9e28d7b03ba8cae66d5fd8b62c96d50b6
batch #44 manifest · 4 entries
the contract refuses any batch that doesn’t follow the previous one, and has no function to edit or delete one — including for us
0x99bb8d92…651f81 on block explorer
No independent copy could be captured for this source.
view the canonical capture · the platform's own API response, kept verbatim and covered by the evidence hash
✓ The anchored proof cannot be rewritten, and the published record is append-only by default. Everything that happened afterward is in the history above — corrections are appended, never silently edited in.
The check runs in your browser and reads the anchored root straight from a public Base node — not from Thonest. How this works.
Disputes
No disputes have been filed. If something here is wrong — a misquote, a wrong date, a misattributed source — say so and it gets answered on the record. How disputes work.