Tom Lee called it:
“So I think in next year is really when Bitcoin can sort of begin to recover and the 200,000 level makes a lot of sense to me.”
On the record 0 days and counting. Nobody can edit it, including Tom.
This will never resolve. No objective test could be drawn from these words without inventing criteria the speaker never set, so it is preserved rather than scored. It stays on the record as something said on a date, and is never counted for or against anyone.
Tom Lee: “So I think in next year is really when Bitcoin can sort of begin to recover and the 200,000 level makes a lot of sense to me.”
No objective test could be drawn from these words without inventing criteria the speaker never set, so it is preserved rather than scored.
No objective test could be drawn from these words, so nothing can settle it. The statement is preserved and dated, and never counted for or against anyone. Thonest will not invent a threshold or a date that was never said — a claim scored against criteria written afterwards would prove nothing.
Submitter-attested — no machine-readable source
Watch what they said — from 2:23 ↗
- ✓ Video and channel verified by YouTube
- ✓ Statement located at 2:33
- — Transcribed and timestamped by the submitter, who confirms they listened to the passage
Tom Lee: But I think again Bitcoin is a genuine store of value. Its supply is limited. Tom Lee: So I think in next year is really when Bitcoin can sort of begin to recover and the 200,000 level makes a lot of sense to me. Kelly Evans: I want to run through some of your picks and Steve can take this wherever we need to go with it.
Transcribed from the audio and confirmed by the submitter, who listened to this passage. YouTube confirms the video and the channel, not the words — those are checkable in one click by anyone. Watch the full moment →
From "Tom Lee's 2026 Crypto Prediction" (Fundstrat).
History — append-only
Proof
2 hashes from this record to the anchored root
- 0x5429c5583e527183074643ab7bd2fbf4b23abd4fb280f90a16956d15726580e0
- 0xf0efb371c4119abfa53918858261ac6f270a66ed84937ed558b95d88fca617ef
batch #36 manifest · 4 entries
the contract refuses any batch that doesn’t follow the previous one, and has no function to edit or delete one — including for us
0x354e0769…c0d31f on block explorer
view the canonical capture · the platform's own API response, kept verbatim and covered by the evidence hash
✓ The anchored proof cannot be rewritten, and the published record is append-only by default. Everything that happened afterward is in the history above — corrections are appended, never silently edited in.
The check runs in your browser and reads the anchored root straight from a public Base node — not from Thonest. How this works.
Disputes
No disputes have been filed. If something here is wrong — a misquote, a wrong date, a misattributed source — say so and it gets answered on the record. How disputes work.